A site should end up with one record, not five opinions.
Land Axis puts the planning picture and the development feasibility for a Victorian parcel on the same record — so the people around a deal are reading the same site.
The same site, assessed from scratch, four times over.
Before anyone can say yes or no to a site, someone opens the state planning map for the zone, hunts the council scheme for the overlay wording, checks the title and cadastre, pulls comparables from a separate subscription, and rebuilds the feasibility in a spreadsheet inherited from the last deal. Then the valuer does the same work again, and the planner after them. One address, hours of it, and no shared record at the end — just several versions of a site that never quite reconcile.
Land Axis exists to collapse that into one pass. Enter a Victorian address, read the controls that actually govern the parcel, test what fits inside them, and model the money — all on the same record, with every assumption visible and dated. We are not there for every layer yet. That is exactly why each one is tagged with where it stands and why the roadmap is public rather than a sales conversation.
Trust before breadth.
A feasibility platform is only worth using if you would defend its output to a lender. Four rules follow from that, and they decide what we build and what we leave out.
Every layer says where it stands
Available now, early access, or on the roadmap — stated on the layer itself, not buried in a release note. You should never have to guess how much weight a number can carry.
No figure without its workings
Every number in a feasibility traces back to an assumption you set and can change. We do not hard-code market rates or hide an adjustment inside a formula you cannot open.
No dead buttons
If something is not built, it is not in the interface pretending otherwise. Breadth is the easiest thing to fake in this category, and the fastest way to lose a professional user.
AI that stays grounded
The assistant answers from your study and the site record in front of it. Where the answer is not in there, it says so instead of producing a confident one.
One state, properly.
Multi-state coverage is the obvious thing to sell and the wrong thing to build first.
Planning control is state law, and the detail that decides a deal — the schedule to the zone, the wording of the overlay, what a setback resolves to on a real lot — does not generalise across a border. So we deliberately paused expanding into other states to finish Victoria: statewide zones, overlays, parcels and lot geometry first, then envelope tests and feasibility built on top of them.
It is a slower way to grow a map and a better way to earn a professional's trust. Other states follow once the Victorian stack is one we would stake a deal on ourselves.
Built in Melbourne, for Australian sites.
Land Axis is a registered business name of Slate Projects Pty Ltd (ABN 38 633 404 109), and is built and operated from Melbourne, Victoria. Primary application databases are hosted in Australia; some map, payment and AI providers process data overseas, which our Privacy Policy sets out in full. We do not sell your project content or your pipeline.
Judge it on a site you know.
Run a Victorian address you have already assessed by hand, and see how much of the desktop study it saves you.